PEPonline
Professionalization of Exercise Physiologyonline

An international electronic
journal for exercise physiologists
ISSN 1099-5862

Vol 4 No 12 December 2001

 


The Power of a Book
Tommy Boone, PhD, MPH, FASEP, EPC
Professor and Chair
Department of Exercise Physiology
The College of St. Scholastica
Duluth, MN 55811
 
On Saturday afternoon, just days after Thanksgiving, I got up from a comfortable chair in my bedroom to look at an old familiar book; a book that a colleague had discarded years ago.  At the time, I was teaching at a university in Mississippi.  It was a good job, up to a point.  While there, it was common practice to leave my office to walk around the buildings to clear my head and to think.  During one of those walks, I noticed a colleague throwing things away, and it occurred to me that one of the items that went into the trash was a book. 

I kept thinking to myself, “How could a teacher throw away a book?”  As it turns out, after getting the book out of the trash, it didn’t look like any of the books taking up space in my office.  After reading the title, The Power of Perception (1) by Marcus Bach, I almost threw it back into the trash.  Even now as I look out over Lake Superior during a day of rain and clouds, I wonder why I still have it.  But, of course, every time I pick it up to glance through the pages, I know it is important to me.  I kept it for many reasons.  It is an inspiring book and, frankly, I can’t read it or even flip through the pages and walk away without having gained an insight or an idea. 

As you might imagine, the insights and ideas that I get when reading the book are directly related to exercise physiology.  Take the title, just a few minutes ago, when I read the title, The Power of Perception, several thoughts ran through my mind.  What if I change the title to "The Power of Exercise Physiology"?  It might be just the title to catch the reader’s attention.  The reader may say, what is the “power” of exercise physiology?  Is it what exercise physiologists do?  Or, is it the profession of exercise physiology that has power? 

Similarly, the subtitle of the book is “What do you see when you look at a rose?”  It is the same question as “What do you see when you look at an exercise physiologist?”  Some will see the rose.  Others see something altogether different.  Likewise, some will see what exercise physiology is reported to be in standard texts.  Others will see what it can be.  What do you see?  Does the title The Power of Exercise Physiology motivate you to think about personal and/or professional possibilities?  Does it make you ask the question, “What is meant by power?” 

Titles are obviously important.  They can cause a potential buyer to stop and get a second look at a book.  Obviously, titles are written to catch the reader’s attention.  They can cause the reader to stop and read an article or to purchase a book.  What do you see when you read a title with the words “exercise physiologist” in it?  The answer may be a personal trainer or a physical educator.  Neither is an exercise physiologist nor is a kinesiologist or someone with an academic degree in exercise science.  What you see is an understanding or insight into your perception, and it is a common occurrence to perceive (i.e., to feel or to think) that a kinesiologist is an exercise physiologist.  The perception by many practitioners inside and outside of the field is a frustration to academically prepared exercise physiologists.  They believe the time as come to stop the mis-thinking. 

If it is a problem, why is the erroneous perception allowed and why is it encouraged by college teachers?  Part of the answer, according to the author of The Power of Perception, may exists in the inability to see the obvious.  Or, stated somewhat differently by the author, new thinking begins with individuals who see the commonly unseen.  Hence, could it be as simple as the teachers’ failure to analyze the academic events and public sector circumstances that surround them and their students?  Is it possible that they don’t know about the American Society of Exercise Physiologists?  Or, is it that they too busy as an advocate of some other field of work?  Perhaps, it didn't occur to them that ASEP has now organized and carried out "four” ASEP National Meetings.  Have the meetings and the presenters literally gone unnoticed?  These questons are real, and they need answers because each one has influenced and affirmed the professional development of exercise physiology. 

Those who understand the “power” of exercise physiology have an inner vision that justifies their deep-seated beliefs in the ASEP movement towards professional development.  Those who fail to believe in these things fail to see or believe in a fuller awareness of the potential of exercise physiologists.  Or, as Bach would say, “Faith is the ability to see what others had failed to see, or to discover what others had vainly hoped to see.” 

As I picked the book from the trash years ago, I could not have realized its significance.  Today, though, Bach's small book (and almost every other book) has something to say about exercise physiology.  Bach has caused me to think about exercise physiology from many directions, and his “insight” is just one bridge that connects new thinking with the new reality of exercise physiology.  The opinions of others do matter, especially in written form even if the topic is entirely about something else.  As an example, Bach writes, “What do you see when you look at a super-highway?”  The question itself causes me to ask, “What do you see when you study the differences in course work and hands-experiences of a kinesiology curriculum and an exercise physiology curriculum?”  While the differences are important, the primary concern here is the “stimulus” for asking the question.  Hence, by a simple twist of fate, the author’s words and insight into his own subject have helped me write this article by using his thinking as a vital and power plate form to reflect on exercise physiology. 

What do you see is an important question, and the introspection itself is imperative.  If we are to understand the commonly unseen, we need to share our thoughts and ideas with individuals within and outside of the emerging profession.  We also need to look for relevant relationships in our existing surroundings.  Even at this point in this article, as I write, my words and thoughts fly from his pages because the way in which Bach writes can be perceived as a template or application of words and ideas to a variety of fields of thought. Talk about the power of a book. If we read and if we listen, we will realize that the message lies in the insight that it provides the reader.  As a writer, I don’t have to travel the road of writing yet another article for PEPonline without a companion.  Maybe also should one of my articles make its way to the desk of an administrator or another exercise physiologist, and should either learn that “what is” within the field is no longer good enough, then, maybe the insights in my article will trigger a new perception of exercise physiology.  Perhaps also ASEP will intrigue them because they will see the unseen!

Upon thinking about what I’ve just written, it occurred to me that the administrators’ motive for change might very well continue to be the well-being of the department.  My motive for change is of course the well-being of all exercise physiologists, which isn't contradictory to Bach's Chapter 2, Reflection, where is states that “reflection has many meanings.”  When everyone is in tune with the urge to discover the greatness within exercise physiology as a profession, it is then the one reflection that will bring us in direct line with our goals.  This is a particularly important point since it is the power that lies in transformational thinking that begins with reflection process and the mental and/or emotional impulse to realize our vision.

The ASEP Vision (2) awakens the unseen by bringing together the imagined with the belief and common sense that together allows for an inventory of where we are and what we have to do to realize professional status in the healthcare, rehabilitation, athletics, and fitness.  Taking inventory is a powerful function because it verifies whether our thinking is in accordance with our actions.  Point in fact, is your answer to the question “What is an exercise physiologist?” in accordance with your actions?  As Bach would say, “Take an inventory!”  Do exercise physiologists really want to have their own profession?  Do they care about a Code of Ethics (3) or a Standards of Professional Practice (4)?  Are they willing to pay the price for their freedom from the inertia of their past history? 

Right answers to the questions just raised are especially important to the growth and stability of the new exercise physiology.  Wrong answers will demonstrate an unwillingness to fight to the fight.  If the heart isn’t in the battle, it will be very hard to persuade others.  Every exercise physiologist must have the awareness of those who suffer from our lack of a professional history and professional credentials.  Bach said it best, “…to accomplish great things we must combine awareness with activity, and to reach a given goal we must never lose the measure of our dreams.”  If I can repeat the last part of his words in my own way, “we must never give up on our vision.”  Who knows what is possible if we just hang in there.  Together, we have a serious chance to create history for all the right reasons.

What do you see when you look at an exercise physiologist?  What do you see when you think about ASEP?  Are you fearful of failure or the awesome responsibilities of a new exercise physiology?  Have you thought about the potential for new ideas, new standards to a new way of thinking, and the discovery of new solutions to our problems?  Maybe this is what is meant by taking responsibility for stepping up to the plate.  I imagine the fast ball puts a little fear in all of us.  For the moment, what is remarkable is that we have a plate unlike anything in history before us. 

Will we do a better job at the plate than those who came before us?  Will we be wiser?  The answer is that we should be, and why not?  We carry within us everything necessary to change the history of exercise physiology.  Ask yourself, “Are you prepared for the journey?”  Is the raising of ASEP and exercise physiology to the status of other organizations and professionals something you really want to do?  If it is, will you take the challenge to lay hold of your dreams?  I believe that it is possible to reach your goal of being a professional and expressing yourself with your own creativity.  And why not begin by saying, “Inspiration begins with the right to be heard, the right to one’s own organization, and the right to discern what is important in life?”

To be frank, it has already begun!  ASEP is reality and exercise physiologists will never be quite the same.  It has changed my thinking, and I’m sure it is doing the same for many others.  It is a matter of expectation.  As Bach puts it in The Power of Perception, “Expectation is a feeling.”  It is a way of thinking that is consistent with what theoreticians say,  “Think great, visualize greatness, hope greatly, and be grateful.”  We should be grateful for our members and their commitment to ASEP.  My wife may have said it best, “All that is needed now to accomplish everything good for exercise physiology is time.” 


Reference
1. Bach, M. (1965). The Power of Perception. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
2. American Society of Exercise Physiologists (2001). ASEP Vision. [Online]. http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/vision.htm
3. American Society of Exercise Physiologists (2001). ASEP Code of Ethics. [Online].
http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/ethics.htm
4. American Society of Exercise Physiologists (2001). ASEP Standards of Professional Practice. [Online]. http://www.css.edu/ASEP/StandardsofProfessionalPractice.html
 


Special Acknowledgment
Having read Marcus Bach’s book several times over the recent years, I must confess that with every reading I have learned something else about writing.  Everybody gives their hand at it either by request of a teacher or because there is something compelling about it.  It is as much about faith and expectation as is our hope for a good life.  Bach’s use of words is different from many books I have read.  His philosophic thinking and common sense application to real life are not only amusing but real; there is meaning to what he writes about.  I understand his father wanted him to do something useful in his life.  That was his wish.  It isn’t that different from most parents’ wish for their children.  If I could, I would like to say that his son's writings have been an insipiration to me.  Thank you.




Copyright ©1997-2007 American Society of Exercise Physiologists   All Rights Reserved.