An Analysis of Job Opportunities
for Exercise Physiologists in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Stacey L. Buser, MS, A.T.,C.
Alan S. Kornspan, Ed.D.
University of Akron
Abstract
Background: One possible
employment area for exercise physiologists is to work in the area of cardiac
rehabilitation. However, little research has been conducted on the
utilization of exercise physiologists in cardiac rehabilitation facilities.
Thus the purpose of this study was to determine important occupational
information about exercise physiologists working in cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: The present
study analyzed the responses of 93 cardiac rehabilitation directors to
an employment survey. Each participant completed a survey assessing
the utilization of an exercise physiologist and the employment status,
education, certifications, internships; patients treated per day, phases
of cardiac rehab supported by the exercise physiologist, salary and job
responsibilities.
Results: Seventy-two
of the 93 program directors reported utilizing exercise physiologists.
Most facilities employed exercise physiologists full-time, while some facilities
employed exercise physiologists part-time. Conclusions: The findings
in the current study seem to be in line with previous research conducted
in the United States.
Key Words: cardiac rehabilitation,
exercise physiologist employment, career opportunity, salary
IN THE PAST DECADE exercise
physiologists has become increasingly important in providing healthcare
to individuals receiving medical attention for cardiac abnormalities
[1]. Thus, many exercise science undergraduate and exercise
physiology graduate
students have an interest in obtaining employment in cardiac
rehabilitation
facilities. It is therefore important that the faculty who
prepare exercise science students understand the needs of these
facilities [2]. But, in general, there are little data to help
guide faculty and students understand the hiring practices
of program directors in cardiac rehabilitation.
Thompson, Bowman,
Kitson, de Bono, and Hopkins [3] analyzed the staffs of 25 cardiac
rehabilitation
facilities in England and Wales. They found that one program out
of 25 employed an exercise physiologist. Roberts
[4] conducted a national survey of exercise physiologists working in
208 cardiac
rehabilitation facilities in the United States. Questions were
asked regarding employment of exercise physiologists, employment status
(part-time
or full-time), education, and certifications
required of exercise physiologists to work in the facility.
Roberts
found that 60% of the facilities employed exercise physiologists.
Also, the average number of exercise physiologists employed was
approximately
two per facility. Forty-eight percent of the facilities
required a master’s degree, and 34% required a bachelor’s degree.
Twenty-two percent of the facilities employed individuals with either a
master’s
or bachelor’s degree. In addition, Roberts [4] found that the
ACSM
certification was required in 43% of the facilities, and that ACLS
certification
was required in 45% of the facilities.
In a similar study, Davis et al. [2] analyzed
the hiring and staffing
practices of program directors in 98 cardiac rehab centers in
California. Results
indicated that: (a) exercise physiologists were the second most common
staff
member in the facility with nurses in first place; (b) of the 128
exercise
physiologists identified, 48 were full-time and 80 were part-time
employees; and (c) the starting salary for exercise
physiologists was $18.24 per hour. The authors also reported that
the Basic Life Support (BLS) and
the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certifications were required
for employment along with an internship in cardiac rehabilitation.
Clearly, more studies are necessary in order to provide the
faculty and students
with useful academic and/or occupational information. Since the
Davis et al.
[2] study was conducted in California, would the reader expect similar
results throughout the United States? More specifically, would a
survey
of cardiac rehabilitation program directors in the Great Lakes region
of
the United States produce similar results? Hence, the purpose of
this study was to
determine the number of exercise physiologists employed in cardiac
rehabilitation
facilities, employment status (full-time, part-time, consultants),
certifications
deemed to be important, importance of the internship for entry-level
exercise
science graduates in order to obtain employment in cardiac
rehabilitation
facilities, and the minimum starting salary for exercise
physiologists.
Additionally, in order to gain information about the training
of exercise physiologists, the present study investigated the areas of
cardiac rehabilitation supported by exercise physiologists, the main responsibilities
of the exercise physiologist, how many patients are treated per day in
the facility, and the minimum educational requirements necessary to obtain
employment as an exercise physiologist in a cardiac rehabilitation setting.
Methods
Participants
Participants included 93 cardiac
rehabilitation program directors in the Great Lakes region, who voluntarily
agreed to participate in the study. Each participant was sent: (a)
a cover letter, which described the purpose of the study; (b) the survey;
and (c) a postage paid envelope to return the questionnaire.
Measures
The questionnaire contained items
and questions assessing whether the facilities currently have
a full-time, part-time, or consultant exercise physiologist on staff. The survey also contained
questions regarding minimum educational training, certifications, internship
importance and availability; number of patients treated per day, phases
of cardiac rehabilitation treated at the facility, phases of cardiac rehab
supported by the exercise physiologist, and approximate starting salary.
Administrators were asked to describe basic job requirements of the exercise
physiology employees.
Results
Results of the study indicated that
exercise physiologists were employed at 72 of the 93 facilities.
Of the 72 facilities that employed exercise physiologists, 59 (82%)
hired exercise physiologists as full-time employees. Part-time
exercise physiologists
were employed at 35 of the facilities. Most rehab facilities
hired either a full-time, parti-time, or a consultant exercise
physiologists. That is, any one facility did not usually hire
more than one of either type. The exception was one facility that
reported the employment of more than 20 exercise physiologists.
In terms of minimum requirements to work as an exercise physiologist,
the program directors indicated that 44 required at least the minimum
of a bachelor’s degree and 28 required at least the minimum of a
master’s
degree to work as an exercise physiologist. Eighty-two facilities
required ACLS certification,
while 66 required CPR/BLS certification. The ACSM certification
was required by 25 facilities (27%). The ACE certification was
required by five facilities. Fourteen (24%) of the 72 facilities
that hired exercise physiologists
required the candidate for a position in their facility to complete an
internship.
Most cardiac rehabilitation facilities in our sample (n = 71, 76%) also
provide internships for students.
Program directors indicated that
the most common phases of cardiac rehabilitation for exercise
physiologists
to support were phases II, and III, IV. It was not as common
to have an exercise physiologist work in Phase I of cardiac
rehabilitation.
Program directors reported that exercise physiologists worked in 34 of
the 38 facilities offering phase IV programs. Exercise
physiologists with an undergraduate (UG) degree averaged $15.58 (n =
20), with an UG degree
and certification $14.46
(n = 15), with an UG degree
and experience averaged $16.70 (n = 15), with an UG degree, certification,
and experience averaged $15.64 (n=14), with a master's degree averaged $15.53
(n = 26), with a master's degree and experience $15.97 (n = 18), and with
a master's degree, certification and experience averaged $16.73 (n = 19).
Qualitative Analysis of Open-Ended
Questions
One open-ended question asked, “If you employ an exercise
physiologist at your facility, what are their primary duties?” Seventy-three
program directors responded with the following:
-
exercise prescription (n = 33)
-
education (n = 31)
-
exercise supervision (n = 22)
-
supervising various phases of cardiac
rehabilitation (n = 20)
-
patient assessments (n=16), and
-
exercise and stress testing.
Other responsibilities included:
-
blood pressure (n = 10)
-
outcome data and charting (n = 8)
-
exercise leader (n = 8)
-
ECG or EKG monitoring (n = 7)
-
exercise instruction (n = 7)
-
working with insurance companies (n
= 6)
-
heart rate (n = 5), and
-
patient care (n = 5).
A few specific responses referred to
the exercise physiologist having the same responsibilities as the registered
nurse (RN). For example, program respondents wrote: “Same as
RN - except for physical assessments, is supervised by RN.” “Everything,
same as RN.” “Everyone has the same responsibilities – RN and exercise
physiologist.”
Discussion
The purpose of the present study was
to survey program directors about the employment of exercise physiologists
in cardiac rehabilitation settings. The results show
that, although nurses are the most common employee in cardiac rehab, exercise physiologists
run a close second. This
finding disagrees with the findings of Thompson et al. [3]
who reported that one out of 25 cardiac rehabilitation facilities in
England employed an exercise physiologist, but agrees with the report by Davis et al. study [4]. They found that
the second most common employee at the cardiac rehabilitation facilities was the exercise physiologist.
The present study also determined the employee status of exercise physiologists. The data
indicate that most of the facilities employed more full-time exercise
physiologists (n = 124) than part-time (n = 74), or as consultants (n
= 10). This finding is not in accordance with the Davis et al. [4]
study in which they found that California cardiac rehabilitation facilities
employed more part-time (n=80) exercise physiologists than full-time (n
= 48). However, in agreement with the Davis
et al. [4] study, the ACLS and BLS certifications are important for employment.
Finally, the present study does not
seem in agreement with Davis et al. [4] in terms of approximate salary
for an exercise physiologist. The present study indicated a lower
salary for exercise physiologists than the Davis et. al investigation.
But, the salaries reported on average seemed to be similar
to the average reported salary for an exercise physiologist ($16.83) working
in a Florida Hospital [5], and the salaries reported from the salary survey
of exercise physiologists by exercisejobs.com [6].
In analyzing the qualitative responses
to the question that asked about job responsibilities of exercise
physiologists,
a variety of responses were received. The responsibilities
for exercise physiologists, according to the program directors, include
exercise prescription and patient education. Also, the exercise
physiologists were responsible for overseeing exercise
testing, which is consistent with the suggestions of Knight, Laubach,
Butcher,
and Menapace [7]. Thus, it would seem important that university
programs
training students for a career in cardiac rehabilitation dedicate part
of
the curriculum to exercise prescription, exercise supervision
and monitoring, and exercise testing.
Other areas and competencies that
are important for exercise physiologists who plan to work in
the cardiac rehab setting is the ability to conduct initial assessments and patient interviews,
the monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, patient
evaluation, and writing program reports. Interestingly, some program
directors suggested that working with insurance companies for billing
purposes is an important area of study for exercise physiologists.
Final Thoughts
The present study assessed items such
as employee status, numbers of exercise physiologists, importance of
certifications
and internships, and salary of exercise physiologists working in
cardiac
rehabilitation. In addition, the present study added important
data
to the literature by assessing the areas of cardiac rehabilitation
supported
by exercise physiologists, and the primary responsibilities of the
exercise
physiologist. This research should help shape the curriculum for
allied
health professionals, including exercise physiologists. Future
researchers should continue to the assessment of these areas to further
understand the role of exercise physiologists in cardiac rehab and
healthcare.
_____________________________________
Author note: Stacey
L. Buser is Clinical Instructor, Alan S. Kornspan is Assistant Professor.
Both are with the Department of Sport Science and Wellness Education.
Address correspondence to: Stacey L. Buser, Department of
Sport Science and Wellness Education, University of Akron, 140 Memorial
Hall, Akron, OH 44325-5103
References
1. Crosby, O. (2001).
You’re a what? Exercise Physiologist. Occupational Outlook
Quarterly. 45:46-47.
2. Davis, S. C., Jankovitz,
K. and Cooper, J. (2001). California cardiac rehabilitation
practitioners and their staff preparation preferences. Clinical
Exercise Physiology. 3:94-101.
3. Thompson, D. R., Bowman,
G. S., Kitson, A. L., Bono, D. P., and Hopkins (1997). Cardiac rehabilitation
services in England and Wales: a national Survey. International
Journal of Cardiology. 59:299-304
4. Roberts, S. O. (1999).
Do exercise physiologists need advanced cardiac life support training?
Clinical Exercise Physiology. 1:100-104.
5. Florida Area Health
Education (AHEC) Network. (2004). Exercise
Physiologist. [Online, October].
http://www.flahec.org/hlthcareers/EXERCISE.HTM
6. Exercisejobs.com.
(2004). Salary survey. [Online, October]. http://www.exercisejobs.com/salary.htm
7. Knight, J. A., Laubach,
C. A., Butcher, R. J., and Menapace, F. J. (1995). American
Journal of Cardiology. 75:390-391.