PEPonline
Professionalization
of Exercise Physiologyonline

An international electronic
journal for exercise physiologists
ISSN 1099-5862

Vol 3 No 1 January 2000

 

Leadership in Exercise Physiology
Tommy Boone, PhD, MPH, FASEP
Professor and Chair
Department of Exercise Physiology
College of St. Scholastica
Duluth, MN

For nearly thirty years now, I have  been studying exercise physiology.  My focus has been on a broad range of questions:  Who are exercise physiologists?  What are the courses exercise physiologists take?  What are the key challenges they face in their work? What do they actually do?  Why are some much more popular and successful than others? How and why is exercise physiology changing?  This thinking has led me to be increasingly interested in the subject of professionalism.  This article explores a useful way of thinking about the professionalization of exercise physiology by examining the question of leadership.

More specifically, I shall argue that exercise physiologists cry out for leadership.  Lack of leadership is the biggest problem we have in making exercise physiology professionally competitive.  By saying  “ the biggest problem,” some may argue that I am overlooking the obvious leaders of exercise physiology.  I am not.  Most of us know that we have men and women in exercise physiology who have worked hard and have been successful in shaping exercise physiology.  They have moved us without coercive means.  But, have they produced the right circumstances by which exercise physiologists are certain of benefiting in the long-term.

To improve exercise physiologists’ ability to compete in the public sector, there is the growing need for leadership.  Today, we need exercise physiologists who are willing to find new ways of doing things, sometimes even approaches that have no precedent.  We need leaders who are put off by the image of and posturing of those who assert that sports medicine is exercise physiology or that sports medicine is the gateway to the future of exercise physiology.  We need more leaders at every level of the profession, from bachelor’s through doctorate.

This idea in itself is radical, especially the shift from just the Ph.D. with leadership skills to the exercise physiology leader with the undergraduate degree.  Rarely is the undergraduate considered in the steps towards professionalism.  It is one thing to have an undergraduate degree, yet another to have the doctorate.  Trying to communicate to others is often met with a competitive intensity among doctorates much less across degrees.

However, there are Ph.D. exercise physiologists, including myself, who think that leadership is learned primarily by leading.  This is not to say that the Ph.D. is worthless or unnecessary to the profession.  But, anyone with or without the Ph.D. can and should seek out leadership positions early in their career.  A first step in understanding who should lead is the person’s genuine interest in the long-term welfare of the profession of exercise physiology.

Leaders create impressive possibilities for those they lead.  They understand the importance of turning around  “what is” to “what can be”.  They understand the importance of keeping exercise physiologists working on an exercise physiology agenda and that it is relentlessly pursued.  In other words, they understand that a vision of what should be, a vision which takes into account the professional interest of all exercise physiologists, is consistent with an ever-changing world and public sector.

Non-Ph.D. exercise physiology leadership is necessary to the continued growth of ASEP.  As an encouragement to get involved with a better way, consider the credo by Bassett (1986). 

    If you think you can’t, you won’t.
  • If you think you can, there is a good chance you will.
  • Making the effort is exhilarating.
  • Reputations are made by searching for things that can’t be done, and doing them.
In light of what has been said, one might conclude that this article is presented only because discussing leadership has become the "in" word in the last 10 years.  Books, articles from all fields, and hundreds, if not, thousands of seminars on leadership have either been published or presented.  So, what is new with this article? The answer "You can be leader."  You can communicate to your exercise physiology friends.  You can help increase control over our emerging profession.  You can collaborate and coach others to understand the importance of having their own professional organization. 

Your help in changing behaviors and attitudes is important in making the transition from the old leadership style involving sports medicine to the new leadership that is driven to bring about your beginning as a recognized professional.  You are part of this new leadership to move away from the old, traditional hierarchy of sports medicine overseeing exercise physiology to a new reality of exercise physiologists working behalf of exercise physiologists.

Exercise physiologists must confront their knowledge, ideas, and information about how they will continue to exist in an increasingly more culturally diverse society.  The American society or "pubic sector" is changing, and exercise physiologists will need to become more responsive to leading and managing society's health, fitness, rehabilitation, and athletic needs.  This new leadership will consists of a sharing of leadership at all levels, including the undergraduate and master prepared exercise physiologists as well as doctorate prepared. 

According to Abramson (1997), "The new leader will be a communicator, articulating what and why something is happening. The new leader will be a collaborator, working with others to make something happen. The new leader will be a coach, developing others so that they can make things happen."  Imagine, from my point of view, as an academic professional (i.e., someone with the Ph.D. degree) , graduating exercise physiologists, as leaders, who will inaddition to their job related skills and responsibilities, foster change in the profession by acting as change agents, as entrepreneurs, and as counselors as their work takes on an even more impressive role in focusing on the public sector.

If the reader of this article is an ASEP non-Ph.D. member, it is important for you to step forward and request the opportunity to share the responsibility of professionalism.  You should be willing to work on behalf of the organization's goals and objectives, and you should assume greater leadership responsibility for yourself, your professional career, and your professional organization.  No longer can anyone accept the notion that the Ph.D. exercise physiologist is working on behalf of all exercise physiologists. 

By thinking as a leader, you will be in a better position to communicate a vision and strategy that is both flexible and yet specific for you.  The good old days are gone.  Now, all of us must learn to embrace a world of ambitious goals by essentially everyone around us.  Let us learn how to work together, as exercise physiology leaders, to fine-tune ASEP to realize our new power to make the impossible happen.



References/Suggested Readings

Abramson, M. A. (1977). Leadership for the Future: New Behaviors, New Roles, and New Attitudes. [Online] http://www.leadership.com/leader.htm

Abramson, M. A. (1966). Watch Out for Change Busters. [Online] http://www.govexec.com/archdoc/0796/0796book.htm

Bassett L, Metzger N. (1986). Achieving Excellence: A Prescription for Health Care Manager. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers, p. 94.



Copyright ©1997-2000 American Society of Exercise Physiologists. All Rights Reserved.

ASEP Table of Contents
Questions/comments

Return to top of page