PEPonline
Professionalization
of Exercise Physiologyonline

An international electronic
journal for exercise physiologists
ISSN 1099-5862

Vol 4 No 2 February 2001

 

STRATEGIES TO TEACH 
EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY PROFESSIONALISM
Jesse Pittsley, MA
Doctorate Student - Exercise Physiology
The University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY

“The professor was heard saying, ‘Class, due in one week, a five-page, typed paper that describes the charteristics that define a profession.  Also, please describe the differences between a discipline and a profession using the current status of the field of exercise physiology in relation to the published requirements."  The question to the reader:  Is this reality?


Introduction
Exercise Physiology is a changing profession.  What was once considered the academic bridge between the professions of physical education and sports medicine, exercise physiology has evolved to include corporate and clinical employment facets to compliment its already strong research core.  As the public’s demand for exercise professionals with a well-developed science background increases, more individuals will want to study and be employed under the title of “exercise physiologist”.  With more entering this diverse field, the need for students at all levels to understand the value and role of professionalizing exercise physiology becomes increasingly vital.  To talk about this subject to only those already in the work force may be too late, and it is becoming evident that the discussion of such issues must arise earlier.  However, it is obvious that the current university curriculum in exercise science/physiology is not designed to deal with such content.  This unfortunate aspect of “what is exercise physiology” must change. The purpose of this article is to examine several current faults in the undergraduate and/or graduate curriculums and introduce some possible changes that present exercise physiology courses may undergo to educate students about professionalization. 

Is Failing to Study Professionalization Unethical?
Choosing to take time out in courses to teach professionalization is a decision many professors are probably unwilling to do, but should they be expected to do so?   The ASEP's Code of Ethics document outlines many of the requirements for professional conduct. The document is based on, "the belief that exercise physiologists are self-regulated, critical thinkers who are accountable and responsible for their high quality competence in the practice and the delivery of exercise physiology concepts, ideas, and services." (1)  It is common for general exercise physiology courses and the traditional exercise testing and prescription courses to tackle such subject matter, but rarely do these courses incorporate the topics of professionalism and/or professionalization.  Issues that pertain to the legal concerns, scientific correctness, ethical questions, and standards of practice may be mentioned, but almost in passing so as to only scratch the service.  The topic of professionalism and professionalization of exercise physiology are not included in these courses.  Yet, item 7 of the Code of Ethics states,  “Exercise physiologists should contribute to the ongoing development and integrity of the profession….(1)”  Thus, it seems logical that if a department offers an “Exercise Physiology” degree, the issues surrounding professionalism and professionalization should be taught.

A Common Theme for Change
The first change that should transpire is holistic and deals primarily with the overall view of the field of exercise physiology.   In undergraduate and graduate programs, all courses in exercise physiology should have a common theme (other than the physiology of exercise) that the students are being educated to become exercise physiologists.  Professors should consider carrying through from course to course the idea that they are educating and assisting in the professional development of exercise physiologists, not unnamed (or multi-named) individuals with a variety of skills.   As an example, in physical therapy, nursing, and in other healthcare programs, students have an understanding prior to beginning their coursework that they will be trained to become a specific type of professional.  The students, as well as the general public, already have a strong understanding of the role of the profession in society.  It is unfortunate this does not apply to most exercise physiology programs of study.  Students are often left with an abundance of knowledge, a plethora of useful hands-on skills, and a well-developed identity crisis.  Following graduation, they are left with the responsibility to "fend" for themselves in a job market full of "weekend certifications," watered-down curriculums, and uneducated employers.

It is difficult to carry the, "…we are here to develop exercise physiologists…," theme through undergraduate and graduate programs when the professors in these programs come from such diverse academic backgrounds.  It is common for programs to have an instructor with a strong clinical background, one with a strength and conditioning background, another from physical education, and others from a variety of research areas; all teaching the same group of students.  This creates both diversity and confusion among the students.  The diverse background of many of the exercise physiologists is a quality that makes the field unique.  The exercise physiologist is not limited to specific realm, and the idea is there may be employment in a variety of markets.  To overcome the diversity, and the fact that diversity has opened the job market, professors should look for common themes.  First, they are educating students to become exercise physiologists, and the same skills and knowledge may be used in many areas.  Second, it should be recognized that exercise physiologists have a code of ethics and standards of professional practice that unify the field’s conduct.  Both the code and the standards should be taught throughout the students’ course work.  Finally, like most in the job market, exercise physiologists need to be entrepreneurs and educate the public of their knowledge and abilities.  Along as diversity is likely to produce a well-rounded professional, then it should be embraced.  But, it should be united with common themes to assist in strengthening the product (i.e., the students).  With these basic themes in place and combined with other educational techniques to build professionalism, progress in thinking as a professional should be forthcoming. 

The Unchanged Exercise Physiology Course
For the exercise physiology profession to evolve, it is important that a certain amount of change takes place in the traditional course entitled, "Exercise Physiology" (sometimes listed as Advanced or Applied Exercise Physiology).  Over time, this course has been regarded as the core of most curriculums.   More frequently today versus a few years ago, there is some discussion, often a very brief review of the history of exercise physiology and its role as an academic discipline in the healthcare community.  There is also the more common and much more engaging lectures on exercise and its application to sports and lifestyle matters.  Such a scope of content will no longer suffice if an exercise physiologist is to be properly educated for the current workforce.  Just recently, Robergs and Roberts published the first exercise physiology textbook that begins with the discussion of the professionalization of exercise physiology (3).  Citing such articles as "I Know You Are an Exercise Physiologist, But What Do You Do? (4), and an article regarding the relationship between ACSM and ASEP (5), the authors open the discussion to the role of the exercise physiology today.  Starting a text with this subject is a significant step forward and, in time, other textbooks will follow.   Beginning a text this way also suggests that courses should introduce the topic of professionalism.   Student should be taught about the professional arena they are about to enter.  In fact, it is rather amazing that the current courses are so saturated with academic information about exercise, but fail to examine content regarding the eventual use of the information as professionals.  Educators fail to mention (for a variety of reasons) that if the field fails to unify its graduates, which is having a negative effect on the job market.  The following are strategies that may be used to modify such a course or other related courses.

What are the Characteristics of a Profession?
With a unified educational staff, students should be taught to define and discuss the qualities that make a profession.  Without this knowledge, students will lack the basic knowledge to critically reflect on the current status and future progress of the field.  Students should able to define the term "profession" and discuss the qualities that differentiate academic disciplines from professions.  For example, the differences between the professions of nursing and medicine and the academic disciplines, biochemistry and biology, should be understood.  This understanding should allow students to see the evolution and goal products of exercise physiology.   In his essay published in PEPonline, Stanley Brown (6) identifies five characteristics (previously published by Purtilo and Cassel) for healthcare professions as:  1) self-governed autonomy; 2) social value; 3) specialized knowledge; 4) representative organization; and 5) lifetime commitment.  What do these terms mean?  Do the collective academic works, faculty, and healthcare practitioners meet these requirements?  Having an appreciation for these questions and the ability to reflect upon them are unfortunately very rare on most campuses. 

However, a person could argue that it isn’t rare for courses in physical therapy and nursing programs to require students to study the characteristics of a profession.  If the professors gave an assignment to study and compare the published criteria for professions, most students from those professions would understand the reasons for doing so.  On the other hand, assigning a similar assignment to exercise physiology student would probably be rather rare and even the purpose may be questioned.   The scarcity of this assignment cannot be credited to its lack of value, but rather to the current status of thinking in exercise physiology.  Some professions have been growing and evolving for over 75 years.  The evolution has taken some professions beyond the criteria discussions on to other issues.  Exercise Physiology is just starting this process.  The analysis of such subject matter as well as the role of professional organizations, accredited curriculums, and certification exams have in meeting these requirements would greatly assist and may even accelerate the development of the field.  Imagine the impact on both the educational process and the outcomes thereof if the majority of the newly educated exercise physiologists understood the concepts and reasons underlying professionalism. 

A Statement of Philosophy
To personalize these concepts, a simple but valuable technique used to stimulate students and encourage analysis is the commonly assigned "Statement of Philosophy."  Such a tool is rarely used in exercise physiology courses, but its value far exceeds the time spent.  Professional curriculums in many fields require students to create a manuscript stating their philosophy about the major.   Typically, the paper is revised throughout the students’ educational term to serve as a baseline for personal and professional analysis and/or the evaluation of new thinking.  Philosophy statements serve to guide students (as well as professionals) through the difficult decisions that all encounter through their careers.  In the athletic administration text by Larry Horine (7), there is an interesting quote by Earl Zeiger,  "Without a philosophy, coaches and physical educators are unguided missiles.” 

The statement of philosophy assignment could be included easily in almost any course offered by the department.  The individual statements may help direct individuals in better understanding such issues as moralistic conduct, value of the client, management style, beliefs regarding continuing education, and the internalized value of the profession.  The academic experience is also important in individualizing the characteristics that make a profession as well as the students’ role in professionalism.  Once this concept is individualized, the personal value of the entire course and curriculum is increase considerably. 

Taking Exercise Physiology to the Next Level
The recently approved ASEP Accreditation Guidelines for the undergraduate degree in exercise physiology, and the Exercise Physiologist Certification exam by the same organization are examples of movement in the right direction.  Now, for the first time in the history of exercise physiology, there are established professional credentials and standards.  The certification itself is a major step in the direction of professionalism, and yet there still many issues that need attention and discussion.  In particular, both the bachelor and the master’s degrees remain primarily focused to develop individuals with knowledge and skills (almost as though they were technicians) and not to develop exercise physiologists (as professionals).  It is this slight shift in focus that remains a significant hindrance in both thinking and doing in this field.  Nursing, medicine, physical therapy, education, and many other professional programs develop individuals with specific titles and diverse skills that allows for widespread employment and a public understanding of the profession’s role in society.   Sharing a common theme, slightly modifying course content, and initiating the analysis of such subject matter should help move the emerging profession of exercise physiology to the next level. 



References

1.  American Society of Exercise Physiologists (1999). Code of ethics [Online]. Available: http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/ethics.htm [2000, August].

2.  American Society of Exercise Physiologists (1999). Scope of Practice [Online] Available: http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/jan14f.htm

3. Robergs, R.A. Roberts, S.O. (2000). Fundamental Principles of Exercise Physiology. (First Edition). McGraw Hill. Boston, MA.

4.  Boone, T. I know you’re an exercise physiologist, but what do you do? Professionalization of Exercise Physiologyonline. 1(3):
http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/pro9.htm

5.  Robergs, R.A. ACSM and exercise physiology: Past, present and future. Professionalization of Exercise Physiologyonline. 1(1). Available:
http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/pro1.htm

6.  Brown, S.P. (2000). The professionalization of exercise physiology: a critical essay.
 Professionalization of Exercise Physiologyonline.  3(6). Available:
 http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/ProfessionalismCriticalEssay.html

7.  Horine, L. (1995). Administration of Physical Education and Sport Programs. (Third Edition). WCB Brown and Benchmark.  Madison, Wisconsin. 


Copyright ©1997-2000 American Society of Exercise Physiologists. All Rights Reserved.




ASEP Table of Contents
 
 

Questions/comments

Return to top of page