Professionalization of Exercise Physiologyonline     


ISSN 1099-5862   Vol 6 No 3  March 2003 
 


 
 











    Editor-in-Chief
    Tommy Boone, PhD, MPH, MA, FASEP, EPC
 

 
The Role of the ASEP National Office in Transforming and Renewing Exercise Physiology 
Tommy Boone
Professor and Chair
Department of Exercise Physiology
The College of St. Scholastica
Duluth, MN 55811

THE GROWING DIVERSITY of job opportunities for exercise physiologists brings new challenges.  Each week, at the ASEP National Office, we receive phone calls regarding everything from locating an exercise physiologist in a specific region of the country to what are the salaries for exercise physiologists.  The people making these calls are not usually concerned whether the exercise physiologist has a doctorate degree.  With what little information they have, it is not uncommon for them to ask questions like: “What is an exercise physiologist?”  Or, “Where can I locate one?” 

Because of the aging population, emphasis on fitness and physical appearance, and all kinds of health issues, a revolution is taking place in the field of exercise physiology.  A new kind of healthcare professional with a strong understanding of scientific research who can guide clients through their concerns is evolving.  The revolution is both ASEP and customer driven with a truly collaborative opportunity that is making a difference.  Each week, we try to answer questions from writers of newspapers, TV shows, and electronic publications.  At times, we are successful and those who seek our expertise are grateful.  Every question is a challenge because the answer must be right and acceptable to exercise physiology in general.  This is not always an easy task to achieve for obvious reasons.

What we try to do is give direction, provide (where possible) a scientific base for the answer and, if necessary, direct the caller to an expert source within the ASEP organization.  These activities take up more time than you might realize.  But, following through with each call is important.  The integrity of the Office is upheld when the staff demonstrates the ability to answer questions and/or to provide a direction to find the answer.  Similarly, providing information about salaries for exercise physiologists is not only productive but a sharing responsibility too.   Traditionally speaking, there is a mind-set among many employers of exercise physiologists that conflicts with our careful effort to provide accurate information. 

On one hand, we understand all too well the likelihood of low salaries that associate with the public’s view of exercise physiologists as physical educators or even as coaches of different sports teams.  On the other hand, it is obvious that some of our callers have experienced a shift in their thinking about exercise physiology.  Their mind-set is more consistent with the ASEP perspective.  It would be good if everyone’s beliefs and understandings were consistent with salaries of recognized healthcare professions.  Changing the public’s exercise physiology paradigm (mind-set) is not easy.  We try to facilitate change, where possible.  That is, we are facilitators as well as risk takers when speaking with the public.

A key to an effective communication with the public is information sharing or, more specifically, salary sharing.  Without the right information, employers cannot identify the right salary ranges for our students when they graduate.  The world is changing, however.  The public is increasingly interested in finding the right professional who can help rethink a personal situation (like reducing weight or building muscle), manage a dysfunction, or rehabilitate a diseased condition.  Hence, there is a new way of viewing exercise physiology today.  The new paradigm is based on a new philosophy and a new belief in the exercise physiology standards of practice.  This new hope centered on exercise physiologists is an increasingly global shift in the public’s growth and transformation regarding the field.  It is a shared vision of what exercise physiology will look like, including its practice, and its meaning to the public in making public-based decisions.

The ASEP National Office is always pushing the infrastructure of the organization.  The staff is devoted to the members of ASEP.  They serve the organization, and the vision of all ASEP exercise physiologists.  It is run on the same principles that any other business is, because we think that’s the right way to reengineer the evolving profession.  Open communication and sharing of information are important, especially when the public’s beliefs and ideas are changing about what exercise physiology is?  The information itself is also a force for shaping the public’s sense of what an exercise physiologist is.  Knowledge and acceptance are being diffused both within and among the public and exercise physiologists as never before.

The sharing of information and the myriad of other responsibilities from the mounting challenges with the ASEP web sites (e.g., www.css.edu/asep/ or the www.asep.org/ ), numerous updates of sites (e.g., www.exercisephysiologists.com/ ), and documents on a regular and even semi-regular basis (i.e., the ASEP electronic journals), along with management of the membership directory, certifications, and a flow of occasional letters to members are important functions of any national office.  Hence, it is not enough to answer the phone.  As a cyberspace office, increasingly more new ideas enter its doors seeking answers.  For an example, there is nothing to lose and everything to gain to post advertisements on the ASEP web site.   Today, ASEP is again posting products and services.  Collectively, these functions and others continue to represent the National Office as a viable and economically healthy environment on behalf of the ASEP members and the public.

The hours that go into managing the ASEP contact page are similar to advertising a product.  Here, the product is “exercise physiology” with the goal to influence the consumers’ feelings about the profession.  The site is also the organization’s attempt to influence politics, safety issues, disputes, and policies that are critical to everything from professional and ethical matters to certification, licensure, and practice issues.  The fundamental values that characterize the ASEP organization can be understood through the daily operations of the ASEP National Office.  ASEP is about providing a competitive edge for board certified exercise physiologists.  The ASEP National Office uses its technology to market board certified exercise physiologists. 

Hence, it is obvious that, where appropriate, we always argue on behalf of exercise physiology even when we are approached by professionals from other fields of study.  Frequently, they are the stimulus for our students to change their academic major (i.e., when they are convinced to do so).  This is a fairly common understanding among those of us who teach at the college level.  As a result, we try very hard to keep consistent with the following statement: “There is nothing to be gained and much to be lost by leaving exercise physiology.”  Of course, regardless of the importance of the statement itself, we still have students who are concerned with the perception of exercise physiology as a profession and the self-image of exercise physiologists in the public.

It may seem strange to the reader for me to write it this way, but bear with me.  The ASEP National Office expects to hear one day with consistency a statement like the following:  “I was educated at a college, and then delivered to the public sector by my professor(s) who are members of ASEP.  As a certified exercise physiologist among many with whom I work, I was taught the meaning of professionalism, ethical conduct, and professional credibility.  In a sense, I was a professional before graduation since I understood the path to professionalism.  We were students in courses about professional development, leadership, and career opportunities.  I can remember thinking how great it was that I was enrolled in an academic major in exercise physiology.  Life as an exercise physiologist has opened new vistas for me.”

My work as the primary person who oversees the ASEP National Office is to structure email and phone conversations to benefit exercise physiology.  It is not always easy to anticipate each and every inquiry.  In addition to our responsibility to ASEP, we have numerous other administrative, professional, and personal responsibilities.  Nonetheless, we give it our very best shot to educate the public, which brings me to our basic beliefs:

1. We feel very strongly in the importance of a credible academic degree as the foundation for exercise physiology.
2. We are convinced that exercise physiology is a healthcare profession with major implications throughout the public sector.
3. We have the opportunity, through our ASEP web pages, to instantly demonstrate professional documents highlighting our highest respect and quality of work with patients, clients, athletes, and others.
4. We believe that the ASEP Board of Directors is doing everything possible to help exercise physiology evolve as a credible profession, and
5. We work at engaging anyone in a conversation about exercise physiology, especially if the emphasis is on the dream of what is possible.

 

Return to top of page