PEPonline
Professionalization
of Exercise Physiologyonline

An international electronic
journal for exercise physiologists
ISSN 1099-5862

Vol 4 No 7 July 2001

 

Physical Assessment: An Often 
Over-Looked Portion of Exercise Testing and Prescription
Mark Kaelin, EP,CSCS
Exercise Physiologist
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program Coordinator 
Southern Indiana Rehabilitation Hospital
New Albany, IN


Looking back at my own experience in school and working with a number of interns from several exercise physiology programs, I have seen one crucial element missing in my own education as well as the education of the interns.  That one important piece to working with patients in rehabilitation is "physical assessment and examination skills".  It is described in Tabors (1) as the examination of the body by auscultation, palpitation, percussion, inspection, and olfaction. 

Students can generally quote exercise principles, MET levels, GXT contraindications, and ECG specs.  But, my experience is that they lack basic physical assessment skills.  Many program directors and chairs appear to believe that the student's internship is the place where these skills should be learned. A few, however, believe that the student should be well versed in physical assessment and exercise skills before becomeing an intern.  It is logical that the time spent at the intern site should be spent in refining skills not teaching the basics. Furthermore, Transmittal AB-01-56 from the Health Care Financing Agency (2) released in April of 2001 states: “Services provided by a student are not reimbursed under Medicare Part B. Medicare pays for services of physicians and practitioners authorized by statute. Students do not meet the definition of practitioners.” Many intern sites and academic programs will have to revamp how and what activities students perform at facilities to insure compliance with these new guidelines.

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of physical assessment as described in Tabors and examples of how these skills are employed in an exercise physiologist's daily interaction with their clients. In this first of four sections, I will review how to record a medical history and to look for what the assessment may mean. 

Although the intern may not realize it, "History and Physicals" (HP) are usually the most important part of the pre-exercise test evaluation (3).  It’s at this point an exercise physiologist can stop an evaluation. For example, when I started graduate school, I worked at a local health and wellness facility. I assumed that a Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) or some sort of screening tool was given to new members before initial training sessions were scheduled. One night while leading a middle-age man through his first workout, I neglected to do an HP.  I put the man on an Air dyne and started him at a low workload (level .5-1.0 or 2.4 to 3 METs) to warm up for 5-10 minutes while I asked him some questions regarding his fitness goals. Repeatedly, I had to get this gentlemen to slow down. After the warm up, he stated, “I guess you need to know I had a heart attack (myocardial infraction, MI) five years ago but I’m O.K. now.”  At that point, a simple training session became much more. In addition to discussing his goals, preferences in exercise, and possible time constraints. I asked several questions regarding his previous medical history and current medications.  Did he have nitroglycerin tablets, if needed?  Had he been through cardiac rehabilitation?  Did his doctor know what he was doing? 

Another example of the value of performing a complete HP occurred later at that same facility when I had started to do the majority of the screenings for the clubs weight loss program. One night while evaluating a 40-year old female, she stated, “I was taking heart medication but I didn’t like the side effects so I quit taking it. Upon further questioning, I found the heart medication she had been taking was an anti-arrhythmic. She further stated, “I haven’t had any problems since I quit taking it.”  I finished the interview portion of the examination, excused myself, and discussed the what I learned with the director. It was my opinion that the woman should be discharged from the facility until she had received a physician's clearance. She was very angry when informed of the decision.  However, she placed herself and the facility in a great deal of danger. We assured her that once she received physician clearance she would be allowed to participate in the program. 

In both instances I was very lucky. The gentlemen who had experienced an MI was medically stable.  He had completed cardiac rehabilitation and was a good candidate for membership in the club.  However, it was important that we were aware of his past history and that emergency contact numbers were on file just in case.  In the second instance, by performing a thorough HP, I was able to stop an evaluation from going any further (which might have endangered the life of the person and/or my employer's livelihood. Since then, any member I worked with completes a PAR-Q in writing or verbally (see below ).  I also perform a systems review with them. 

PAR-Q
For most people, physical activity should not pose any problems or hazard. PAR-Q has been designed to identify the small number of adults for whom physical activity might be inappropriate or those who should have medical advice concerning the type of activity most suitable.

    Yes   No 
1. ___   ___ Has your doctor ever said you have heart trouble? 
2. ___   ___ Do you frequently have pains in your heart and chest?
3. ___   ___ Do you often feel faint or have spells of severe dizziness?
4. ___   ___ Has a doctor ever said your blood pressure was too high?
5. ___   ___ Has your doctor ever told you that you have a bone or joint problem such 
                  as arthritis that has been aggravated by or might be made 
                  worse by exercise?
6. ___   ___ Is there a good physical reason not mentioned here why you should 
                  not follow an activity program even if you wanted to? 
7. ___   ___ Are you over 65 and not accustomed to vigorous exercise?

If a person answers "yes' to any question, vigorous exercise or exercise testing should be postponed.  Medical clearance may be necessary (3).

In many cases, the client might answer, “yes” to one or more of these questions.  The client might also respond further by saying, “My health care provider told me I need to exercise and recommended your facility.”  In addition, the client may have physician clearance to begin exercising.  Now, what do you do?  In short, you need to find out more information.  One method is by performing a client history and a systems review. 

 A thorough client history should include:

• Name, age, and sex 
• Occupation (current or prior if retired)
• Family health history
• Emergency contacts names and numbers
• Physician's names and phone Numbers
• Medical and surgical history
• Medication list: Here, it is important to ask how the drugs are prescribed and how the client takes them. 
• Systems Review: A screening process that provides information about the bodily systems.(4
Systems Review
Have you ever been diagnosed or experienced problems with: 

Yes    No 
____   ____ Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA)
____   ____ Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA)
____   ____ Hypertension
____   ____ Heart
____   ____ Lung 
____   ____ Liver
____   ____ Kidney
____   ____ Diabetes Mellitus: Insulin Dependent (IDDM)
____   ____ Diabetes Mellitus: Non Insulin Dependent (NIDD) 
____   ____ Vision
____   ____ Seizures
____   ____ Orthopedic
____   ____ Gastrointestinal
____   ____ Genitourinary

Depending on where you work (clinic vs. wellness facility), it may be important to document and review some additional points:

1. Client pain levels (This is now the fifth vital sign, recorded daily.)
2. Barriers to communication (e.g., vision, hearing, and language)
3. Signs of abuse or neglect
4. Learning style
5. Patient input into care and patient goals

At this point, you are probably thinking, this will takes hours.  Do I really need to know all this? The answer is "Yes".  Many times an exercise physiologist, either in the clinic or a wellness center, might see a client for a primary diagnosis (dx) of de-conditioning. Yet, the question is, "Does the client have any secondary concerns and issues that the staff members need to know about?"  As an example, let’s say your working with a 68-year old male at your gym who has been referred by his doctor because of complaints of fatigue and shortness of air (SOA) with exertion. Upon gathering the history, you find he was frequently exposed to chemical solvents and solutions hazardous to lung tissue in his occupation. He also frequently neglected to wear protective equipment because it was uncomfortable.  Is the man’s SOA due to de-conditioning or from occupational exposure to chemicals that have caused some form of obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease?  Can you diagnose the problem in anticipation of the right training program?  NO!  But, if concerned, you can contact the man’s physician and request more information. Maybe, after speaking with the man's physician, you learn that the physician and the man are interested in beginning the exercise to see if the cause of the SOA is just de-conditioning. You then track his ratings of SOA and aerobic exercise tolerance in METs over an eight week period. At week eight, the client still reports severe SOA with exercise with the performance of some ADLs and is going to see his physician regarding this. To provide additional insight, you could supply this client with a letter describing the clients complaints, what has been done at your facility to alleviate them, and what progress has been made (e.g., aerobic capacity and muscular strength). 

A thorough HP enables exercise physiologists to make educated and knowledgeable decisions. Does this member or client need a medically supervised exercise test before beginning training? Would a cardiac or pulmonary patient’s aerobic capacity be more effectively assessed by performing a six-minute walk versus a graded exercise test (GXT). Also, by being knowledgeable of a client's medical history, exercise physiologists can design the optimal intervention to reduce the chance of morbidity and improve quality of life. 

As our population ages, exercise physiologists will be challenged to keep people active and independent. To make the best exercise recommendations, exercise physiologists need to know how to deal with multiple clinicial concerns and issues. For example, did you know?  In long term stroke survivors, cardiac disease is the most common cause of death.  It occurs more frequently than a subsequent stroke (5). Individuals with severe COPD are at risk of death from congestive heart failure (6).  Falls are the third leading cause of death in the elderly (7).

By knowing the client's medical history, the exercise physiologist can more effectively address all of a client's morbidity and design a program that will reduce as many risk factors as possible. With practice, experience, and training, the exercise physiologist can conduct a thorough evaluation in a short period of time. However, it is also important to use this time to begin building rapport with the client and to insure that the client's exercise program is safe, enjoyable, and worthwhile.

In summary, the basics of how to perform the history portion of a physical assessment have been described. In the August issue, a review of the auscultation basics and techniques will be presented. 



References
1.  Taber’s cyclopedic medical dictionary. (19th edition). Philadelphia, PA: F.A.DavisCo.2001. 
2.  Transmittal AB-01-56. Available: www.hcfa.gov
3.  ACSM. Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. (4th edition). Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger. 
4.  Hall CM and Brody LT. (1999) Therapeutic exercise: moving toward function. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
5.  Roth EJ.(1994). Heart disease for patients with stroke. Part II: Impact and implications for rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75:94-101.
6. Zielenski J, MacNee W,Wedzicha J,Ambosino N,et al. (1997). Causes of death in patients with COPD and chronic respiratory failure. Monaldi Archives Chest Disease. 52(1): 43-47.
7.  Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D. (1989). Rick factors for recurrent non-syncopal falls: a prospective study. JAMA 261:163-168. 


Please forward any questions and comments to the author at mkaelin@sirh.org
Copyright ©1997-2001 American Society of Exercise Physiologists. All Rights Reserved.

ASEP Table of Contents
Questions/comments

Return to top of page