Believing in ASEP is Important
Mannie E. Hall Jr., PhD, MPH, FAAHEP
Master Teacher in Educational Technology
and Retired U.S. Army
Director, Center for Educational
Technology and Distance Education
American Academy of Health Education
and Promotion (AAHEP)
Virtual, USA
“It is better to be nobody
who accomplishes something than a somebody who accomplishes nothing.”
-- A. Pudit
As the American Society of Exercise
Physiologists (ASEP) emerges as a noteworthy professional organization,
I’ve found the articles by Dr. Tommy Boone interesting. His views
of what the organization can do to secure a career niche are not just interesting,
but on the right path as well. The purpose of the ASEP organization
is clearly stated, and without a doubt the leadership has demonstrated
guts in making important decisions that have distinguished ASEP from other
competing organizations.
Ultimately, however, ASEP must attract
a substantial number of new members. It would be fairly easy to argue
that ASEP is doing its best given the circumstances. The new ASEP
board certification for exercise physiologists is one such major step in
the right direction. The second thing that is fundamental to any
evolving profession is the emphasis placed on accreditation. The
public has got to have trust and confidence in exercise physiologists.
This is also why ASEP is important. Imagine exercise physiologists
without a standards of practice. This was exactly the case before
the founding of ASEP.
These accomplishments however come
with a price. It involves decision making that has not always been
popular with existing organizations and their leadership. But who
said that organizations are democratic institutions? Politics is
obvious among all organizations. All anyone can do is stand up for
what he or she believes is right. ASEP is doing a pretty good job
communicating this to others. The leadership is being heard and believed.
But, I’m afraid that not everyone is listening. There is plenty of
room to grow.
One area of growth is still in the
career niche opportunities for exercise physiologists? Perhaps the
ASEP leadership should invest more time in thinking about unique areas
of work that will help the members and the young professionals become more
skilled and qualified. From a business view, is there a new product
mix that has not been examined yet? How can the ASEP perspective
be marketed better to students? Exercise physiologists have tremendous
confidence in their research abilities; why not obtain other unique skills
and qualifications (e.g., computer skills and distance learning) that are
essential to securing a spot in the 21st century job market?
Sure it is nifty to gain the attention
of sports medicine, generate a virtual platform for exercise physiologists,
create accreditation and certification standards, and inspire a new generation
of exercise physiologists, but what about the disconnect between the new
generation of exercise physiologists and the older elite generation (i.e.,
those who have elevated themselves to academia)? Are those individuals
in academia doing their best to establish cutting-edge exercise physiology
curricula that prepare students for the 21st century job market?
Can you teach an old dog new tricks? Does an old dog want to learn
new tricks? Maybe a survey might be helpful in finding some answers
to these questions?
Of course the work that would go
into developing a survey and carrying it out should not be just on the
backs of the ASEP leadership. They are working pretty hard doing
a lot of things on behalf of the members. Maybe interested members
might develop a genuine interest in gathering “informative” data about
what exercise physiologists think. What do you think? Maybe
members could get more involved in the passion for change. Has anyone
read Boone’s work? He has asked dozens of questions in his articles.
He has poured his heart into writing about exercise physiology. Maybe
it is time to jump in and tell everyone that we “believe in the cause”
and the vision of ASEP, right?
Beyond that, I think it is a matter
of persuading friends, teachers, and colleagues to read and think about
the ASEP vision. And I think it is critical that we speak to everyone
to make sure that they can get involved in the ASEP organization.
This reminds of something years ago, “It is impossible to communicate too
much.” If we really believe in where we are going, and we believe
it is right (as Boone has suggested), then we need to do whatever we can
do to make it happen. This is critical to becoming a leader in the
healthcare industry. Many roadblocks have been broken since the founding
of ASEP, and we should be happy with our core effort. But, there
is a lot of work yet to be done. Aside from the very important question,
“What is good for our students?” -- We need answers to the following
questions:
1. How can we capitalize
on career opportunities?
2. How can we inspire changes in
lifestyle and beliefs about disease?
3. What is our role in the
epidemic of obesity?
4. How should we educate students
in the area of public health?
5. Do young exercise physiologists
know how to write grants?
6. Are the young students today
part of the computer generation?
7. Is there a way for the new generation
and the older generation to close the gap?
8. Do professors have the skills
and/or desire to effectively employ educational technology for the purposes
of promoting learning and connecting with the computer generation?
9. Could ASEP spearhead an effort
to promote the infusion of educational technology into the field of exercise
physiology?
10. Would educational technology
skills assist young exercise physiologists get better jobs and also help
professors improve their teaching in a way that connects with the computer
generation?
Answers to these questions are important.
We need to constantly challenge ourselves by asking questions and building
a culture of professionalism and self-renewal. And, finally, I believe
the following quote is especially important to all exercise physiologists:
“If you don’t know where
you are going, you will end up somewhere else.” -- L. Peter
I believe ASEP has the understanding
of where it is going. Its vision is a statement of fact that basically
identifies the intended conditions of its success. It is a destination
and, presumably, an objective for all ASEP exercise physiologists.
Why not get involved with the work of the ASEP organization? What
could be better than advancing the common welfare of all exercise physiologists
in the United States?