PEPonline
Professionalization
of Exercise Physiologyonline

An international electronic
journal for exercise physiologists
ISSN 1099-5862

Vol 3 No 2 February 2000

 

The Importance of Maximal Graded Exercise 
Testing in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Eating Disorders
Susie McMinn, M.S. 
Exercise Physiology
Pediatric Cardiology Associates
Dallas, Texas

Background
I currently administer maximal GXTs to pediatric patients who visit our practice with potential heart problems.  A growing portion of that population is eating disorder patients.  In response to this increasing demand, we established an eating disorder clinic including a cardiologist, exercise physiologist, nutritionist, psychologist, and a nurse practitioner to administer a complete rehabilitation program.  Our current recovery protocol has developed over the last 3 years in response to what we have learned about the physiological and psychological course of recovery for this diverse and difficult population.  Maximal exercise stress testing has become an important part of that process.

The Patients
Most of our patients are female, between the ages of 11 and 18.  They come to us with varying degrees of an eating disorder, but most have quantifiable cardiac problems including:

    atrophy of ventricle walls and decreased cardiac muscle mass
    incompetent (leaky) cardiac valves
    systolic dysfunction
    bradycardia
    arrthymias
    chest pain
    low blood pressure
    decreased amplitude of T wave and QRS complex
    increase in QT interval (especially with rapid weight loss)
    autonomic alteration of HR variability (HR max suppressed)
In addition they are usually withdrawn, angry and are actively denying their problem.  They are also usually taking an antidepressant.

Rehabilitation
Initially, we used maximal exercise testing early in the rehabilitation process to access cardiac vulnerability during exercise.  We quickly learned that exercise testing needed to be delayed to later in the recovery process for several reasons.  In the early days of our program at least half of our exercise tests were positive for arrthymias.  We often saw cardiac dysfunction during exercise testing despite normal resting ECGs and echocardiograms.  In addition, we had trouble dealing with patients who were still denying the severity of their problem.  Although denial continues to be a problem for most of our patients regardless of the amount of time they have been in our program, delaying our maximal exercising tests until 3 months into rehabilitation has resulted in fewer positive tests and a greater ability to communicate with the patients about healthy exercise habits.

Most of out patients use exercise as a means of controlling body weight and therefore, often abuse it.  They are very anxious to reach the exercise testing stage of our rehabilitation, so we have been able to use it as a reward for diligent nutritional and psychological work by the patient.  Also, we needed to refeed these patients and obtain normal resting ECGs and echocardiograms prior to exercise testing in order to ensure that our rehabilitation process was safe for the patient. 

There is no classic eating disorders patient.  From our experience over the last three years, we have realized that these patients are not easily stereotyped.  Therefore we have instituted a conservative approach to rehabilitation that employs broad parameters so that all patients can safely recover from the above-mentioned cardiac complications.  During the first 3 months of rehabilitation the patients are completely restricted from exercise.  Instead they are required to focus on weight gain and psychological and family problems

After our patients complete 3 months of refeeding and psychological counseling they perform a maximal treadmill test using the modified Bruce protocol.  They must first obtain clearance from their nutritionist and psychologist before testing.  We do not test any patients who arrive at the lab and have lost weight as of their last visit, have a resting HR < 50 or a systolic BP < 90 mmHg.

Exercise rehabilitation involved 3 maximal stress tests at 3 month intervals with modest but increasing exercise prescriptions in the interim.  If any ground is lost in terms of weight or psychological problems we restrict exercise and restart that portion of the rehabilitation from the beginning.  Exercise poses a risk for these patients not only because of the physical consequences of their starvation, but due to their extreme and unhealthy exercise habits.  We attempt to teach them moderation and to respect the physical consequences of their eating disorder and excessive exercise.

Summary
Eating disorder patients are not easily described or understood.  They come in all shapes and sizes and attempting to find commonality between them regarding their psychological problems is very difficult.  However, certain cardiac dysfunctions are extremely common in this group including, bradycardia, cardiac wall thinness, incompetent (leaky) cardiac valves and low blood pressure.  Maximal exercise stress testing has been invaluable to our diagnostic and rehabilitation effort with these patient.  We believe that it is an essential part of eating disorder rehabilitation, despite the infrequency of its use in many rehabilitation programs.

In addition, we have noticed a significant number of patients, at least during their first maximal exercise test, who were unable to generate a maximal heart rate (> 15 beats lower that predicted HR max) despite lengthy exercise test times and the appearance of maximal exertion.  We suggest that this may be evidence of altered autonomic control of HR variability, and seems to be one of the last symptoms to abate during rehabilitation.  This question is an excellent research problem for anyone interested in exercise and eating disorders.



Copyright ©1997-2000 American Society of Exercise Physiologists. All Rights Reserved.

ASEP Table of Contents
Questions/comments

Return to top of page